Guitar & Bass

How Double Tracking Guitars Works – Recording Secrets Revealed

Double tracking is a technique whereby one would record the exact same part twice. Double-tracking does not refer to recording an alternate line or a harmony part; it is the same part recorded for the second time. Why would you do that? A double-tracked part can give incredible thickness and richness to a part. It works particularly well with distorted electric riffs. Believe me, I’ve experimented with double-tracking everything; some things work better than others!

The aim is for the average listener not to notice that there are two recordings of the same part. The doubled part needs to be performed tightly resembling the main line. If the playing is sloppy, it makes the part sound smeared. A double-tracked part may require a bit of editing to get the parts to match and synchronize with each other, but don’t over-edit! You want the timing to be close but not to microsecond precision. The value is in the small discrepancies between the recordings.

Have a listen to this classic example Master of Puppets by Metallica:

James Hetfield of Metallica is famous for his precision riffage. The untrained listener will barely tell that there are 2 or 3 tracks of the same riff throughout the song. Listen to the first minute and try and distinguish the hard left and hard right panned electric guitars. This is an example of the double tracks recorded using identical signal chains. Also, don’t forget that 1986 was pre-Pro Tools, so this precision is a result of his performance, not the engineer nudging in Pro Tools!

Panning the doubled part

Commonly, the two takes will be panned hard left and hard right. The result of this will be a guitar part that spans the entire stereo spectrum, but with significant portions of the part in the centre of the stereo field. How it works — notes that line up perfectly will appear in the centre, but slight timing differences will offset the sound to the left or right. The result is a super wide, yet natural-sounding guitar.

 

A screenshot from a session. Note the panning (100L and 100R) on the two guitar tracks.

Why don’t you just track the part once and then duplicate it?

I’m glad you asked. If you duplicate a track and pan each dupe left and right, the mixed sound will just come out of the stereo centre with no stereo spread. The technical term is correlation and decorrelation. When you duplicate a track, the two tracks have 100% correlation. When you play the two tracks together, it is the equivalent of simply increasing the volume of one of them!

Now when you record the part a second time and play the two tracks together, there will be significant de-correlation between the signals, resulting in variance between left and right.

Vectorscopes show the stereo spread of a stereo signal. On the left is the act of duplicating a track, panning each subsequent track hard left and hard right. You can see on the vectorscope a single line in the middle verifying that the resulting sound is simply mono in the centre. On the right is the vectorscope with a true double-tracked guitar. You can see information scattered front centre to left/right and also portions of the sound that are out of phase. I used Izotope Ozone 9 to create these images.

How similar do the sounds have to be? Can I do the secondary performance with a different guitar, amp or mic?

Another great question – you’re on fire! There are two approaches to this, and both are valid. Having the two tracks identical in terms of signal chain and equipment creates a very uniform sound – if the playing is tight then it will sound like a big guitar to the listener.

The more distinctive you make the parts, the more separation and the more it will sound like two guitars playing. If you do the double track with a different guitar or different amp, it will sound significantly different. My preference is to use the same signal chain and equipment for both doubles.

What else is good doubled?

Sound sources that are very rhythmic with strong transients are difficult to double, for instance, a snare drum (I did say I’ve tried everything!) is very difficult to double. The timing has to be perfectly spot on, otherwise, it sounds very smeared. Acoustic guitars are another good one, but again it relies heavily on the tightness of the performance. If the player is spot on with the timing, it works well.

Instruments that have softer, rounder transients, such as backing vocals, saxophone, trumpet and synth parts work really well. Distorted guitar is typically quite compressed by definition, which makes it easier to double track without it sounding smeared, dirty guitars are already smeared!

So, there you have it, a little recording secret of pop music producers. Whilst I have experimented with lots of other sounds, be free to explore more yourself, you just might find another instrument or sound source that works for your next massive hit!

David Lauritsen

Build a Playable Layered Patch with Cubase 16 Instrument Stacks

Combine a piano, pad and sampler layer in Cubase 16, then shape what each layer…

1 day

The Score Elements Is a Free Kontakt Library for Sketching Film Cues

Sketch a film cue with Sonuscore’s free Kontakt Player library. Here’s how to claim it…

1 day

Ibanez Meets Dragon Ball Z

Ibanez and Dragon Ball Z have something in the works. Here’s a first glimpse, with…

2 days

Free Complete Access Collection Offers 16 Plug-ins Without iLok

Slate Digital, SSL, Harrison Audio and sonible feature in a permanent free collection, with updated…

2 days

Arturia’s Tape J-37: Vintage Tape Magic with a Modern Twist

Arturia, the French music technology company known for recreating iconic gear in software form, has…

2 days

TR-1000 1.50 Adds Note Sequencing and Keeps Effects Through Kit Changes

Roland’s TR-1000 1.50 update adds note and keyboard modes for compatible generators, plus effects continuity…

2 days